# Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 15, 2013 · 135 Ohio St. 3d 1442

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796963

## Case

- **Full name:** Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 15, 2013
- **Citations:** 135 Ohio St. 3d 1442; 987 N.E.2d 699
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796963

## Opinion text

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this matter is remanded to the board for clarification of the board’s recommendation that purports to adopt the *1443 panel’s findings of fact and misconduct, yet finds that respondent violated only Prof.Cond.R. 3.1 and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G), while the panel found that respondent violated Prof.Cond.R. 3.1, Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(d), Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).
Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796963. Public record. Not legal advice.