# State v. McAlmont

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 27, 2012 · 133 Ohio St. 3d 162

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796643

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio v. McAlmont
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 27, 2012
- **Citations:** 133 Ohio St. 3d 162; 976 N.E.2d 898
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Gunnell, Lanzinger, Ohio, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796643

## Opinion text

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 .
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee.
Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796643. Public record. Not legal advice.