# State v. Freeman

> Ohio Supreme Court · October 12, 2011 · 130 Ohio St. 3d 205

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796611

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio v. Freeman
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 12, 2011
- **Citations:** 130 Ohio St. 3d 205
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796611

## Opinion text

{¶ 1} Proposition of Law No. I is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. On consideration of Proposition of Law No. IV, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2010-Ohio-6320 , 941 N.E.2d 768 . On consideration of Proposition of Law No. VI, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Dunlap, 129 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2011-Ohio-4111 , 953 N.E.2d 816 .
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katherine Mullin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl Prichard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6796611. Public record. Not legal advice.