# Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 2, 2010 · 127 Ohio St. 3d 122

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795655

## Case

- **Full name:** Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. R & D Machine, Inc.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 2, 2010
- **Citations:** 127 Ohio St. 3d 122; 936 N.E.2d 960
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton, Would
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795655

## Opinion text

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2010-Ohio-3237 , 934 N.E.2d 913 , and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.
Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795655. Public record. Not legal advice.