# State v. Hamilton

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 2, 2010 · 127 Ohio St. 3d 120

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795654

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio v. Hamilton
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 2, 2010
- **Citations:** 127 Ohio St. 3d 120; 936 N.E.2d 960
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795654

## Opinion text

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Horner, 126 Ohio St.3d 466 . 2010-Ohio-3830 , 935 N.E.2d 26 .
Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Lanzinger, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6795654. Public record. Not legal advice.