# Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 21, 2007 · 113 Ohio St. 3d 36

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6790367

## Case

- **Full name:** Disciplinary Counsel v. Young
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 21, 2007
- **Citations:** 113 Ohio St. 3d 36
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Stratton
- **Judges:** Began, Connor, Consideration, Cupp, Donnell, Ended, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Rogers, Stratton, Third, Whose
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6790367

## Opinion text

Lundberg Stratton, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 35} I concur in the majority’s opinion and judgment, except that I would run the indefinite suspension concurrently with respondent’s current suspension, as I do not believe that the infraction, which was committed during the same time period as his previous misconduct, warrants the more severe sanction of consecutive time.
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Brian E. Shinn, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Murman & Associates and Michael E. Murman, for respondent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6790367. Public record. Not legal advice.