# A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 19, 2006 · 112 Ohio St. 3d 1208

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789977

## Case

- **Full name:** A. Schulman, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Wilkins, Tax Commr., and
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 19, 2006
- **Citations:** 112 Ohio St. 3d 1208
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789977

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 6} I continue to believe that a dual filing requirement such as that contained in R.C. 5717.04 should not be part of our rules. See Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242 , 2006-Ohio-4091 , 852 N.E.2d 178 , ¶ 4-5 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). I believe this case should be heard on the merits. I dissent and would deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789977. Public record. Not legal advice.