# Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bailey

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 6, 2006 · 110 Ohio St. 3d 223

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789308

## Case

- **Full name:** Cincinnati Bar Association v. Bailey
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 6, 2006
- **Citations:** 110 Ohio St. 3d 223; 852 N.E.2d 1180
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Stratton
- **Judges:** Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789308

## Opinion text

Lundberg Stratton, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 23} I concur with the majority to the extent that the opinion adopts the board’s findings concerning respondent’s unauthorized practice of law. However, I respectfully dissent from the amount of the civil penalty imposed. Instead, I would impose a civil penalty of $1000 for each of the 14 violations documented by client files admitted into evidence at the hearing, for a total of $14,000.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6789308. Public record. Not legal advice.