# Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. McCray

> Ohio Supreme Court · April 26, 2006 · 109 Ohio St. 3d 43

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788762

## Case

- **Full name:** Ohio State Bar Association v. McCray
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 26, 2006
- **Citations:** 109 Ohio St. 3d 43
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Moyer
- **Judges:** Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788762

## Opinion text

Moyer, C.J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 22} I respectfully dissent from the conclusion that respondent’s conduct was not prejudicial to the administration of justice under DR 1-102(A)(5). Even though no apparent harm resulted from respondent’s conduct, respondent nonetheless chose to ignore a court order. Such conduct, in my view, violates DR 1-102(A)(5). Moreover, I disagree with the sanction imposed on respondent. I believe that a six-month suspension, with a conditional stay, would be a more appropriate sanction.
O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788762. Public record. Not legal advice.