# Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moesle

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 2, 2005 · 106 Ohio St. 3d 475

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788537

## Case

- **Full name:** Columbus Bar Association v. Moesle
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 2, 2005
- **Citations:** 106 Ohio St. 3d 475
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Stratton
- **Judges:** Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788537

## Opinion text

Lundberg Stratton, J.,
concurring.
{¶ 11} I write separately to explain my concurrence in the majority’s opinion. Normally, one incident giving rise to the charges in this complaint would not have warranted an indefinite suspension. But when a respondent fails to respond to the complaint, he leaves us little choice, as his conduct demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the disciplinary process. Therefore, I concur in the indefinite suspension.
Bruce A. Campbell, Bar Counsel, and Jill M. Snitcher McQuain, Assistant Bar Counsel; Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn and Bridgette C. Roman, for relator.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6788537. Public record. Not legal advice.