# Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2003 · 99 Ohio St. 3d 48

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6786135

## Case

- **Full name:** Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 16, 2003
- **Citations:** 99 Ohio St. 3d 48
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6786135

## Opinion text

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451 , 2002-Ohio-6718 , 780 N.E.2d 543 .
Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants.
Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M. Oxley and Erin N. Cahill, for appellee.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6786135. Public record. Not legal advice.