# Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 18, 2002 · 97 Ohio St. 3d 456

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784936

## Case

- **Full name:** Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Houston v. Wilkinson, Appellees Lee v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 18, 2002
- **Citations:** 97 Ohio St. 3d 456; 780 N.E.2d 548
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cook
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 68 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784936

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- emphasizing that parole board may "consider any circumstances relating to the offense or offenses of conviction, including crimes that did not result in conviction, as well as any other factors [it] deems relevant"

## Opinion text

Cook, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 30} Because I would decide these cases consistent with the reasoning expressed in Robertson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., Franklin App. No. 01AP-1111, 2002-Ohio-4303 , 2002 WL 1935700 ,1 respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784936. Public record. Not legal advice.