# Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Cook

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 6, 2002 · 97 Ohio St. 3d 225

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784888

## Case

- **Full name:** Toledo Bar Association v. Cook
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 6, 2002
- **Citations:** 97 Ohio St. 3d 225
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Douglas
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Petree, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Tenth
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784888

## Opinion text

Douglas, J.,
dissenting.
Mark S. Barnes, Margaret Weisenburger and Jonathan B. Cherry, for relator.
James D. Caruso, for respondent.
{¶ 14} I respectfully dissent. I would suspend the respondent for six months but stay the entire suspension. The panel hearing this case made such a recommendation to the board. I would follow the recommendation of the panel, including the recommendation as to a two-year probationary period.
F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784888. Public record. Not legal advice.