# Board of Education v. Montgomery County Board of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 12, 2002 · 95 Ohio St. 3d 462

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784307

## Case

- **Full name:** Board of Education of the Vandalia-Butler City School District v. Montgomery County Board of Revision
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 12, 2002
- **Citations:** 95 Ohio St. 3d 462; 768 N.E.2d 1175
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Pfeifer
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784307

## Opinion text

Pfeifer, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 7} I concur with the majority’s implicit determination that R.C. 5715.19(A)(1) requires complaints to be brought in the name of the owner. However, I strongly disagree with the majority’s implicit conclusion that this case amounts to multiple appeals within the statutory time period. When one large *463 parcel is divided into many distinct plots, the right to appeal should be determined by plot, not by the parcel as a whole. To do otherwise is grossly unfair to the actual users because of the multiple uses to which the land is put. Accordingly, I concur in part and dissent in part.
Rich, Crites & Wesp, Jeffrey A. Rich and Mark H. Gillis, for appellant in case Nos. 2001-0948 and 2001-0949.
Sebaly, Shillito & Dryer, L.P.A., Martin A. Beyer and Lynn Bruckelmeyer, for appellees Dayton Airport Inn and Kittyhawk Corp., in case No. 2001-0948.
Froelich & Weprin Co., L.P.A., and Gary L. Froelich, for appellee Carroll Building Co., LLC, in case No. 2001-0949.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6784307. Public record. Not legal advice.
