# Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Cicirella

> Ohio Supreme Court · January 30, 2002 · 94 Ohio St. 3d 224

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6783703

## Case

- **Full name:** Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Cicirella
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 30, 2002
- **Citations:** 94 Ohio St. 3d 224; 761 N.E.2d 1046
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cook
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6783703

## Opinion text

Cook, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority’s imposition of an indefinite suspension inadequately takes into account such aggravating factors as respondent’s prior disciplinary offenses, her repeated failure to cooperate in the investigation of grievances, and her disregard for the orders of this court. See Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, Section 10(B)(1), Guidelines for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions. I would disbar respondent.
Steven L. Gardner, Martha H. Krebs and Stanley E. Stein, for relator.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6783703. Public record. Not legal advice.