# State v. Weideman

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 14, 2001 · 91 Ohio St. 3d 1446

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6782491

## Case

- **Full name:** State v. Weideman
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 14, 2001
- **Citations:** 91 Ohio St. 3d 1446; 742 N.E.2d 144; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 410
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6782491

## Opinion text

Portage App. No. 98-P-0109. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed *1447 October 10, 2000, at page 2:
“Whether a stop and detention of a motorist by a police officer, who is beyond his or her jurisdictional limits, for an offense observed and committed outside the officer’s jurisdiction automatically constitutes a per se unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, thereby triggering the mandatory application of the exclusionary rule to suppress all evidence flowing from the stop.”
Cause consolidated with 00-2126, State v. Weideman, Portage App. No. 98-P-0109.
The conflict cases are State v. Filler (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 731 , 667 N.E.2d 54 ; State v. Tennison (Apr. 14, 1989), Wood App. No. WD-88-41, unreported, 1989 WL 35534 ; State v. Brown (Apr. 16, 1999), Pickaway App. No. 98CA27, unreported, 1999 WL 259649 ; and State v. Hammons (Aug. 28, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16931, unreported, 1998 WL 543363 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6782491. Public record. Not legal advice.