# Taylor v. Mitchell

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 2000 · 88 Ohio St. 3d 453

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6781249

## Case

- **Full name:** Taylor v. Mitchell, Warden
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 17, 2000
- **Citations:** 88 Ohio St. 3d 453; 727 N.E.2d 905
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6781249

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Any defect caused by the alleged failure to file criminal complaints or the claimed impropriety of the municipal court’s assumption of jurisdiction over the rape charges is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Taylor was convicted and sentenced upon an indictment regularly issued, and the common pleas court had jurisdiction to try, convict, and sentence him on the charged offenses. See State ex rel. Dozier v. Mack (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 368, 369 , 708 N.E.2d 712, 713 ; see, also, Simpson v. Maxwell (1964), 1 Ohio St.2d 71 , 30 O.O.2d 40 , 203 N.E.2d 324 ; Orr v. Mack (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 429, 430 , 700 N.E.2d 590, 591 (“[A]fter a conviction for crimes charged in an indictment, the judgment binds the defendant for the crime for which he was convicted.”). 1
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
. Taylor waived the additional claims he raises on appeal by failing to raise them in the court of appeals. Brown v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 593 , 716 N.E.2d 183 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6781249. Public record. Not legal advice.