# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 10, 1998 · 84 Ohio St. 3d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6778568

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 10, 1998
- **Citations:** 84 Ohio St. 3d 1; 701 N.E.2d 681
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Stayed, Stratton, Sweeney, Years
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6778568

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules as charged. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended- from the practice of law. A condition of respondent’s possible reinstatement will be evidence of compliance with his contract with OLAP. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would suspend respondent for two years with one year stayed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6778568. Public record. Not legal advice.
