# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 13, 1996 · 77 Ohio St. 3d 91

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774628

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 13, 1996
- **Citations:** 77 Ohio St. 3d 91; 671 N.E.2d 232
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774628

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record indicates that respondent requires rehabilitation. This court’s duty to the public requires that respondent affirmatively demonstrate his rehabilitation before we allow him to resume his place on the rolls of those permitted to practice law in Ohio. We have thus far suspended respondent from the practice of law for an interim period. We now hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Costs taxed to the respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774628. Public record. Not legal advice.