# Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 21, 1996 · 76 Ohio St. 3d 374

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774497

## Case

- **Full name:** Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 21, 1996
- **Citations:** 76 Ohio St. 3d 374; 667 N.E.2d 1189; 1996 Ohio LEXIS 590
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Douglassweeney
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 52 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774497

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that it is possible, yet still rare, for a patent and unambiguous lack of personal jurisdiction to warrant a writ of prohibition

## Opinion text

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ.,
dissent and would grant the writ because relator lacks sufficient minimum contacts with Ohio necessary to satisfy constitutional due process.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6774497. Public record. Not legal advice.