# State v. Brown

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 14, 1996 · 74 Ohio St. 3d 523

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6772785

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio v. Brown
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 14, 1996
- **Citations:** 74 Ohio St. 3d 523; 660 N.E.2d 448
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6772785

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. In this court, appellant makes no attempt to establish good cause, but instead argues the questions he wanted the court of appeals to hear, but which it did not hear. The application was rejected for failure to state a good cause for late filing. That is the issue before this court. Since appellant does not even address the issue, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6772785. Public record. Not legal advice.