# State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 29, 1993 · 67 Ohio St. 3d 605

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768635

## Case

- **Full name:** The State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 29, 1993
- **Citations:** 67 Ohio St. 3d 605; 622 N.E.2d 335; 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768635

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597 , 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.
Writ allowed.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately.
Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768635. Public record. Not legal advice.