# State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Democratic Party Executive Committee v. Taft

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 11, 1993 · 67 Ohio St. 3d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768456

## Case

- **Full name:** The State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Democratic Party Executive Committee v. Taft, Secretary of State
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 11, 1993
- **Citations:** 67 Ohio St. 3d 1; 615 N.E.2d 615; 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1567
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768456

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that suspected violations of campaign-finance laws are not sufficient evidence of incompetence
- reaffirming that the abuse-of-discretion standard applies in these circumstances

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The executive committee mainly argues that Taft’s rejection of its recommendation was an abuse of discretion. We agree and, therefore, issue the requested writ of mandamus.
R.C. 3501.07 permits the appropriate county executive committee to recommend a candidate for a vacancy on the county board of elections. The statute also provides:
“The secretary of state shall appoint such [qualified] elector, unless he has reason to believe that the elector would not be a competent member of such board. In such cases the secretary of state shall so state in writing to the chairman of such county executive committee, with the reasons therefor, and such committee may either recommend another elector or may apply for a writ of mandamus to the supreme court to compel the secretary of state to appoint the elector so recommended. In such action the burden of proof to show the qualifications of the person so recommended shall be on the committee making the recommendation. If no such recommendation is made, the secretary of state shall make the appointment.”
We have held that this statute affords the Secretary of State “broad discretion in determining whether recommended appointees are competent to be members of boards of elections,” State ex rel. Democratic Executive Commt. v. Brown (1974), 39 Ohio St.2d 157, 160 , 68 O.O.2d 100, 102 , 314 N.E.2d 376, 378 , and we continue to adhere to this view. However, we now hold that when the Secretary of State rejects a recommended appointee for failure to comply with the campaign finance laws, suspected violations of these requirements will not, standing alone, justify the conclusion that the appointee is incompetent to serve.
Accordingly, we hereby grant the writ of mandamus and order that Taft approve the executive committee’s recommendation to appoint Dimora to the vacancy existing on the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections.
Writ granted.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., dissents.
Wright, J., not participating.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6768456. Public record. Not legal advice.