# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 2, 1992 · 64 Ohio St. 3d 460

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765383

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 2, 1992
- **Citations:** 64 Ohio St. 3d 460; 597 N.E.2d 85; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1902
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765383

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765383. Public record. Not legal advice.