# Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 17, 1992 · 64 Ohio St. 3d 32

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765292

## Case

- **Full name:** Columbus Bar Association v. Baer
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 17, 1992
- **Citations:** 64 Ohio St. 3d 32; 591 N.E.2d 1209; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1339
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Reprimand, Resnick, Sanction, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765292

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
*35 Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.
Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6765292. Public record. Not legal advice.