# Becker v. Shaull

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 12, 1992 · 62 Ohio St. 3d 480

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763808

## Case

- **Full name:** Becker v. Shaull Long
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 12, 1992
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio St. 3d 480; 584 N.E.2d 684
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Douglas
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Strausbaugh, Sweeney, Tenth, Wright
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763808

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding no negligence per se when alleged violated statute, R.C. 5589.06, lacked the specificity required to impose negligence per se upon the finding of a violation

## Opinion text

Douglas, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763808. Public record. Not legal advice.