# Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 18, 1991 · 62 Ohio St. 3d 224

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763739

## Case

- **Full name:** Dayton Bar Association v. Gross
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 18, 1991
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio St. 3d 224; 581 N.E.2d 520; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2895
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Douglas
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763739

## Opinion text

Douglas, J.
Upon a complete and careful review of this matter, we find that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), and we accept the board’s recommendation that indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this state. However, under the facts of this case, we find that respondent is entitled to be given credit for the time he has already served since our order of suspension of July 25, 1990. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Sweeney, Holmes, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763739. Public record. Not legal advice.