# Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 11, 1991 · 62 Ohio St. 3d 178

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763718

## Case

- **Full name:** Cincinnati Bar Association v. Spitz
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 11, 1991
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio St. 3d 178; 580 N.E.2d 1071; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763718

## Opinion text

Herbert R. Brown, J.,
dissenting. In this case the panel who heard the evidence believed the appropriate sanction to be a public reprimand. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline also recommended a public reprimand as the appropriate sanction. Considering the record, I would not reject those recommendations.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763718. Public record. Not legal advice.