# Akron Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff

> Ohio Supreme Court · October 16, 1991 · 62 Ohio St. 3d 72

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763683

## Case

- **Full name:** Akron Bar Association v. Naumoff
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 16, 1991
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio St. 3d 72; 578 N.E.2d 452; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2287
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763683

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation of a public reprimand. However, we refuse to allow six months more to pass before Stidd is repaid the $12,344.30 he was overcharged. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 2-106(A) and (B), and ordered to make restitution within sixty days of the date of our order. If respondent fails to meet this deadline, he is to be immediately suspended from the practice of law in Ohio until such time as restitution is made. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6763683. Public record. Not legal advice.