# Hope v. Highland County Board

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · 56 Ohio St. 3d 68

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762728

## Case

- **Full name:** Hope v. Highland County Board of Revision
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 12, 1990
- **Citations:** 56 Ohio St. 3d 68; 564 N.E.2d 433; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1710
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762728

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Adherence to the provisions of the appellate statutes is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the BTA to hear appeals. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Bowers (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147 , 34 O.O. 8 , 70 N. E. 2d 93 . R.C. 5717.01 is specific and mandatory. It requires that notice of appeal be filed by the appellant both with the board of revision and with the BTA. Failure to comply with the appellate statute is fatal to the appeal. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 46 Ohio St. 3d 192 , 546 N.E. 2d 404 . See, also, Fineberg v. Kosydar (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 1 , 73 O. O. 2d 1, 335 N.E. 2d 705 ; and Zephyr Room, Inc. v. Bowers (1955), 164 Ohio St. 287 , 58 O.O. 67 , 130 N.E. 2d 362 .
The decision of the BTA is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and it is hereby affirmed.
Decision affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762728. Public record. Not legal advice.