# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · 56 Ohio St. 3d 58

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762725

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 12, 1990
- **Citations:** 56 Ohio St. 3d 58; 564 N.E.2d 84; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762725

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762725. Public record. Not legal advice.