# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 12, 1990 · 53 Ohio St. 3d 265

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762631

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 12, 1990
- **Citations:** 53 Ohio St. 3d 265; 559 N.E.2d 1359; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762631

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762631. Public record. Not legal advice.
