# State ex rel. City of Canfield v. Frost

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 1, 1990 · 53 Ohio St. 3d 13

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762560

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. City of Canfield v. Frost
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 1, 1990
- **Citations:** 53 Ohio St. 3d 13; 557 N.E.2d 1206; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 315
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Douglas
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762560

## Opinion text

Douglas, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The appellee has an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal and thus prohibition in this case is not proper. Further, a civil service commission has a right to interpret its own rules. In this case, those rules accord appellant a right of appeal. Therefore, again, prohibition should not lie.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762560. Public record. Not legal advice.