# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1990 · 51 Ohio St. 3d 98

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762429

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 23, 1990
- **Citations:** 51 Ohio St. 3d 98; 554 N.E.2d 1320; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762429

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily completes a two-year monitored probation period and complies with the five requirements enumerated in the panel’s opinion. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762429. Public record. Not legal advice.