# State ex rel. Eliza Jennings, Inc. v. Noble

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 21, 1990 · 49 Ohio St. 3d 71

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762220

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Eliza Jennings, Inc. v. Noble, Director
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 21, 1990
- **Citations:** 49 Ohio St. 3d 71; 551 N.E.2d 128; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 68
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Wright
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Only, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 49 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762220

## Opinion text

Wright, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Under the peculiar facts of this case I question whether appellee had an adequate remedy at law. More important, appellant granted the “tap-in’’ permits in accordance with the writ granted by the court of appeals without applying for or being granted a stay. This appeal is clearly moot and this cause should be dismissed out of hand.
Resnick, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6762220. Public record. Not legal advice.