# Bridges v. McMackin

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 26, 1989 · 44 Ohio St. 3d 135

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6761890

## Case

- **Full name:** Bridges v. McMackin, Supt.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 26, 1989
- **Citations:** 44 Ohio St. 3d 135; 541 N.E.2d 1035; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 167
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6761890

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Appellant argues that R.C. 2725.03 is an unconstitutional limitation of the original habeas corpus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141,149 , 40 O.O. 2d 141,146, 228 N.E. 2d 631, 639-640 . However, R.C. 2725.03 does not attempt to limit the habeas corpus jurisdiction of any court; it merely allocates it among the courts of appeals on a territorial basis. Section 3(B)(1)(c), Article IV, Ohio Constitution gives each court of appeals original jurisdiction in habeas corpus, but does not guarantee that such jurisdiction shall be statewide. We therefore find R.C. 2725.03 constitutional.
Appellant further argues that R.C. *136 2725.03 is inapplicable because the location of Marion Correctional Institution is not “fixed by statute.” However, appellee directs our attention to R.C. 2967.01, which includes “the Marion correctional institution” in its definition of the term “[s]tate penal or reformatory institution.” We hold this sufficient to fix the institution’s location in Marion. Hence, R.C. 2725.03 was correctly applied by the court of appeals. The judgment of the court of appeals is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6761890. Public record. Not legal advice.