# Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Hall

> Ohio Supreme Court · September 7, 1988 · 38 Ohio St. 3d 342

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760632

## Case

- **Full name:** Geauga County Bar Association v. Hall
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 7, 1988
- **Citations:** 38 Ohio St. 3d 342; 528 N.E.2d 192; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 295
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760632

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This court’s review of the record also supports that respondent’s conduct violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 9-102(B)(3), and 9-102(B)(4). In the past, we have responded to misconduct like respondent’s by suspending the violator indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Disciplinary Counsel v. Heck (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 33 , 15 OBR 133, 472 N.E. 2d 694 ; Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v. Schnittger (1983), 3 Ohio St. 3d 26 , 3 OBR 497, 445 N.E. 2d 662 . As a result, we must reject the sanction recommended by the board. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Locher, J., not participating.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760632. Public record. Not legal advice.