# State v. Holloway

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 24, 1988 · 38 Ohio St. 3d 239

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760612

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Ohio v. Holloway
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 24, 1988
- **Citations:** 38 Ohio St. 3d 239; 527 N.E.2d 831; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 277
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Holmes
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 275 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760612

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that failure to object insufficient on its own to establish Highland App. No. 25CA24 34 ineffective assistance of counsel; instead, a defendant still must demonstrate that counsel substantially violated an essential duty and that counsel's performance materially prejud…
- stating that failure to object insufficient on its own to establish ineffective assistance of counsel; instead, a defendant still must demonstrate that counsel substantially violated an essential duty and that counsel’s performance materially prejudiced the defense

## Opinion text

Holmes, J.,
concurring. I concur in both the syllabus and judgment and, in the main, with the total opinion. I write solely to reference my disagreement with State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369 , 513 N.E. 2d 744 , which is cited with approval by the majority herein.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760612. Public record. Not legal advice.