# Board of Education v. Board of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 6, 1988 · 37 Ohio St. 3d 318

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760348

## Case

- **Full name:** Board of Education of the Mentor Exempted Village School District v. Board of Revision of Lake County Shulman
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 6, 1988
- **Citations:** 37 Ohio St. 3d 318; 526 N.E.2d 64; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 204
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Douglas
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760348

## Opinion text

Douglas, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. It has long been the policy of this court not to disturb a decision of the BTA regarding valuation unless the decision of the BTA is unreasonable or unlawful. Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 , 44 O.O. 2d 30, 239 N.E. 2d 25 .1 do not find from the record that the decision of the BTA fails either test. I would affirm the decision of the BTA.
Moyer, C.J., and Sweeney, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760348. Public record. Not legal advice.