# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 1, 1988 · 37 Ohio St. 3d 77

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760275

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 1, 1988
- **Citations:** 37 Ohio St. 3d 77; 523 N.E.2d 857; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 157
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Christley, Douglas, Eleventh, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760275

## Opinion text

H. Brown, J.,
dissenting. I believe the appropriate penalty in this case is a suspension from the practice of law for six months which was the recommendation to us by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Bar.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760275. Public record. Not legal advice.