# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1988 · 37 Ohio St. 3d 42

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760261

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 25, 1988
- **Citations:** 37 Ohio St. 3d 42; 523 N.E.2d 513; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 136
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Wright
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760261

## Opinion text

Wright, J.,
dissenting. The facts in this case indicate that respondent participated in — indeed, he was the driving force behind — a $200,000 illegal drug deal. Therefore, I believe that permanent disbarment would be a more appropriate sanction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760261. Public record. Not legal advice.