# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1988 · 37 Ohio St. 3d 42

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760260

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 25, 1988
- **Citations:** 37 Ohio St. 3d 42; 523 N.E.2d 513; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 136
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760260

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. However, we find the sanction recommended was not appropriate when compared to the misconduct committed. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760260. Public record. Not legal advice.