# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 1988 · 36 Ohio St. 3d 205

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760219

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 4, 1988
- **Citations:** 36 Ohio St. 3d 205; 522 N.E.2d 572; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 112
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760219

## Opinion text

H. Brown, J.,
dissenting. Since the respondent was once disciplined in Texas for the conduct which is before us, I believe the sanction we should impose is a public reprimand as recommended by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Bar.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760219. Public record. Not legal advice.