# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 16, 1988 · 35 Ohio St. 3d 264

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760142

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 16, 1988
- **Citations:** 35 Ohio St. 3d 264; 520 N.E.2d 221; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760142

## Opinion text

H. Brown, J.,
dissenting. Taking into account the disciplinary violations in this case, I would suspend the respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.
Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760142. Public record. Not legal advice.