# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 16, 1988 · 35 Ohio St. 3d 264

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760141

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 16, 1988
- **Citations:** 35 Ohio St. 3d 264; 520 N.E.2d 221; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760141

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur.
*266 Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6760141. Public record. Not legal advice.