# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 26, 1987 · 32 Ohio St. 3d 155

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759905

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 26, 1987
- **Citations:** 32 Ohio St. 3d 155; 512 N.E.2d 674; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 362
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759905

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that Ronald A. Banig did in fact violate the Disciplinary Rules as set forth above.
We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759905. Public record. Not legal advice.