# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 23, 1986 · 25 Ohio St. 3d 132

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759407

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 23, 1986
- **Citations:** 25 Ohio St. 3d 132; 25 Ohio B. 177; 495 N.E.2d 433; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 709
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759407

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), a lawyer shall not violate a Disciplinary Rule; DR 1-102(A)(3), a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude; and DR 1-102(A)(6), a lawyer shall not engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.
We concur in the board’s conclusion regarding the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is the order of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6759407. Public record. Not legal advice.