# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 31, 1984 · 15 Ohio St. 3d 121

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758654

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 31, 1984
- **Citations:** 15 Ohio St. 3d 121; 15 Ohio B. 272; 472 N.E.2d 1072; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1275
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758654

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.
Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758654. Public record. Not legal advice.