# Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heck

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 13, 1984 · 15 Ohio St. 3d 33

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758622

## Case

- **Full name:** Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heck
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 13, 1984
- **Citations:** 15 Ohio St. 3d 33; 15 Ohio B. 133; 472 N.E.2d 694; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1257
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758622

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
An assiduous scrutiny of the record compels us to accept the findings of the board. Although the commingling of client funds with those of the attorney, to the prejudice of a client, warrants strong disciplinary action, it is respondent’s demeanor throughout these pro *34 ceedings that is ultimately responsible for the gravity of the sanction we impose today.
Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758622. Public record. Not legal advice.