# Clermont County Bar Ass'n v. Meeker

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 7, 1984 · 14 Ohio St. 3d 21

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758589

## Case

- **Full name:** Clermont County Bar Association v. Meeker
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 7, 1984
- **Citations:** 14 Ohio St. 3d 21; 14 Ohio B. 325; 470 N.E.2d 891; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1231
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758589

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This court concurs in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (5) and (6), DR 6-101(A)(3), DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3), and Gov. Bar R. I and V(4). The record amply supports the board’s conclusions.
We further agree that respondent should be indefinitely suspended. Respondent’s failure to make an appearance at any stage of these proceedings not only thwarts the investigation into professional misconduct but evidences an apathetic and cavalier attitude toward his professional and ethical responsibilities. We are mindful that Gov. Bar R. V(7) requires that respondent be indefinitely suspended in light of his previous sanction. Nevertheless, in our view respondent’s conduct would warrant an indefinite suspension in any event.
*24 Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6758589. Public record. Not legal advice.
